Ainfo Consulta

Catálogo de Información Agropecuaria

Bibliotecas INIA

 

Botón Actualizar


Botón Actualizar

Registro completo
Biblioteca (s) :  INIA Las Brujas.
Fecha :  31/05/2023
Actualizado :  31/05/2023
Tipo de producción científica :  Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales
Autor :  RUBIO, V.; SAWCHIK, J.; VAN ES, H.
Afiliación :  VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; JORGE SAWCHIK PINTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; HAROLD VAN ES, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Título :  Soil health benefits from sequence intensification, fertilization, and no-tillage in annual cropping systems.
Fecha de publicación :  2022
Fuente / Imprenta :  Soil Security. 2022, Volume 9, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074 -- OPEN ACCESS.
ISSN :  2667-0062
DOI :  10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074
Idioma :  Inglés
Notas :  Article history: Received 14 June 2022; Received in revised form 4 August 2022; Accepted 1 September 2022; Available online 5 September 2022. -- Corresponding author at: Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. E-mail address: vr349@cornell.edu (V. Rubio). -- This research was funded by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Uruguay. -- Supplementary materials. -- License: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/). --
Contenido :  The expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual crop... Presentar Todo
Palabras claves :  Cover crops; No-tillage; Pastures; Sequence intensification index; Soil health; Soil quality.
Asunto categoría :  P30 Ciencia del suelo y manejo del suelo
URL :  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006222000405/pdf
Marc :  Presentar Marc Completo
Registro original :  INIA Las Brujas (LB)
Biblioteca Identificación Origen Tipo / Formato Clasificación Cutter Registro Volumen Estado
LB103520 - 1PXIAP - DDSoil Security/2022

Volver


Botón Actualizar


Botón Actualizar

Registro completo
Biblioteca (s) :  INIA Las Brujas.
Fecha actual :  17/08/2023
Actualizado :  17/08/2023
Tipo de producción científica :  Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales
Circulación / Nivel :  Internacional - --
Autor :  CAZZULI, F.; DURANTE, M.; HIRIGOYEN, A.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; ROVIRA, P.J.; BERETTA, V.; SIMEONE, A.; JAURENA, M.; SAVIAN, J.V.; POPPI, D.; MONTOSSI, F.; LAGOMARSINO, X.; LUZARDO, S.; BRITO, G.; VELAZCO, J.I.; LATTANZI, F.; BREMM, C.
Afiliación :  FIORELLA CARLA CAZZULI ALBA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTÍN DURANTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay, Concepción del Uruguay 3260, Argentina; ANDRES EDUARDO HIRIGOYEN DOMINGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ, Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA BERETTA, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay; ÁLVARO SIMEONE, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS POPPI, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XIMENA MARIA LAGOMARSINO LARRIERA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de la Empresa, Luis Alberto de Herrera 2890, Montevideo 11300, Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ IGNACIO VELAZCO DE LOS REYES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil.
Título :  Beef cattle grazing native grasslands may follow three different supplement response patterns.
Fecha de publicación :  2023
Fuente / Imprenta :  Grasses. 2023, Volume 2, Issue 3, pages 168-184. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses2030014 --- OPEN ACCESS.
ISSN :  2813-3463 (electronic).
DOI :  10.3390/grasses2030014
Idioma :  Inglés
Notas :  Article history: Received 3 May 2023; Revised 1 July 2023; Accepted 13 July 2023; Published 7 August 2023. -- Academic Editor: Fabio Gresta. -- FUNDING: This research was funded by INIA Uruguay. -- LICENSE: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). --
Contenido :  ABSTRACT.- Previous studies on winter supplementation of growing cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands suggest that forage allowance (FA), herbage mass, and weather conditions before and during the supplementation period could all affect supplement feed efficiency (SFE)-that is, the difference or change in average daily gain (ADG) between supplemented (S) and control (C) animals (ADGchng, kg) per unit (kg) of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. In this study, we analyse data from fifteen collated winter supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 2004 and 2018. The working hypotheses of this research paper were: (i) that average substitution rates are positive, and (ii) that ADGchng is not constant throughout the supplementation period and that its variation may be attributed to sward, animal or weather variables. There were two main objectives: (i) to estimate the average supplement substitution rate (sSbR, kg forage, f, dry matter, DM intake reduction: kg supplement DM intake) and potential herbage intake substitution rate (hSbR, kg fDM intake reduction: kg fDM intake of control animals), and its association with SFE, and, (ii) to assess the existence of different phases and supplementation response patterns and its association with other relevant variables. Estimated substitution rates were always positive (sSbR = 0.3-1.1 kg/kg; hSbR = 0.1-0.3 kg/kg) and were negatively and moderately associated with SFE. Supplementation proved to be a dynamic proces... Presentar Todo
Palabras claves :  Concentrate supplementation; Substitution rate; Supplement feed efficiency; Supplementation response pattern.
Asunto categoría :  L02 Alimentación animal
URL :  https://www.mdpi.com/2813-3463/2/3/14/pdf
Marc :  Presentar Marc Completo
Registro original :  INIA Las Brujas (LB)
Biblioteca Identificación Origen Tipo / Formato Clasificación Cutter Registro Volumen Estado
LB103636 - 1PXIAP - DDGrasses/2023
Volver
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check!
 
 

Embrapa
Todos los derechos reservados, conforme Ley n° 9.610
Política de Privacidad
Área Restricta

Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
Andes 1365 - piso 12 CP 11100 Montevideo, Uruguay
Tel: +598 2902 0550 Fax: +598 2902 3666
bibliotecas@inia.org.uy

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional